Rohit Kapoor Says:
# A3425LB June 7th, 2011 at 10:33 pm
The biggest corruption is in the line of petroleum, oil and refinery. In each family, only one petrol pump can be allotted. I have an example where one person (Mr. Anil Garg, A-10 Naraina Vihar) is running 27 petrol pumps and the officers of the company (indian oil) are dummy partners in the same. The person who actually owns one the pump is not even let into the premises.
Indian Oil, the bank where they have the account, the officers, everyone from top to bottom is in the corruption loop.
# A3419LB June 7th, 2011 at 10:32 pm
किसी भी कार्यालय में अगर बजट में जारी हुए रुपए अतिरिक्त हो तो वोह रूपए बर्बाद करने के बजाये गरीब जनता के कार्यो में ही इस्तेमाल हो और बजट का सही सही मुल्यानाकन हो
Tapash Bose Says:
# A3413LB June 7th, 2011 at 10:28 pm
There is life risk to a common man who lodge complain against corruption. Is there any provision to give him protection ? If not the corrupt officer or politician may take the help of criminals to kill him. Please make the provision.
O P KHANDURI Says:
# A3412LB June 7th, 2011 at 10:28 pm
JURISDICTION OF JAN LOK AYUKT AND TO INVESTIGATE INTO THE CORRUPTION CGARGES AGAINST THE JUDGES SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT. THER ARE MANY MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT COVERAGE OF SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT JUDGES UNDER THE JAN LOK PAL BILL. CONSTITUTIONALLY THERE IS NO PROHIBITION AGAINST COVERAGE OF THE JUDGES. THE ONLY PROVISION UNDER ARTICLE 124 IS THAT A JUDGE SHALL BE DISMISSED UNDER THE WARRANT OF THE PRESIDENT AFTER THE ADDRESSAL OF THE ISSUE IN BOTH THE HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT IN ALL OTHER MATTERS THE JUDGES ARE AS GOOD AND BAD AS COMMON CITIZENS OF THE COUNTRY. ABOVE ARTICLE ALSO PROVIDES THAT PARLIAMENT CAN MAKE A LAW FOR INVESTIGATING INTO THE MISBEHAVIOUR OF THE JUDGES. THEREFORE UNDER THE PROPOSED ACT THE PARLIAMENT CAN PROVIDE FOR THE COVERAGE OF THE JUDGES BY JAN LOK AYUKT AND ITS CONTITUTIONALITY CANNOT BE CHALLENGED. ONLY THEIR DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS OTHERWISE THEY CAN BE PUNISHED OR THE CORRUPT PROPERTY MONEY, ASSETS, WEALTH CAN BE RECOVERED FROM THEM AND THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL PROHIBITION.
HOWEVER MY ONLY APPREHENSION IS ABOUT THE WORD MISBEHAVIOUR USED IN ARTICLE 124 INSTEAD OF MISCONDUCT. ALTHOUGH IN MY OPINION MEANING OF BOTH IS SAME BUT THE SUPREME COURT AND THE HIGH COURT JUDGES TO FAVOUR THEMSELVES CAN INTERPRET THE WORD MISBEHAVIOUR DIFFERENTLY FROM MISCONDUCT BECAUSE ULTIMATELY THE HIGH COURTS AND SUPREME COURTS HAS THE JURISDICTION OVER ALL ACTS WHENEVER THEY COME FOR INTERPRETATION OF THE COURTS AND THAT JURISDICTION OF SC/HC CANNOT CONSTITUTIONALLY BE TAKEN OUT. SO THEREFORE TO SAY THAT JUDGES CANNOT BE COVERED UNDER JAN LOK AYUKT ANTI CORRUPTION ACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THEREFORE NON SENSICAL.
Satyendra Pandey Says:
# A3411LB June 7th, 2011 at 10:28 pm
कुछ मामले ऐसे भी होते है जिनमे सबूत का मिलना मुमकिन नहीं हो पता है, ऐसे में अगर कोई लोक पल में शिकायत दर्ज कराता है तो उसे किस प्रकार से निपटाया जायेगा ?
क्या गुप्त रूप से भ्रस्टाचार की शिकायत किया जा सकता है इस कानून में ?
Deepak Arora Says:
# A3407LB June 7th, 2011 at 10:24 pm
Respected Sir, My suggestion is if we would like to stop culture of curroption, there is only one system to stop, that is to adopt plastic money and stop cash in any feild, every transaction must be based on other than cash mode & a single point money ID should be allocated to every citizen and a transaction based taxation process should be validate. Thanks & Regards
Suksha Wadhwa Says:
# A3385LB June 7th, 2011 at 10:04 pm
My suggestion is---
Prime Minister is elected person,so come under Lok Pal.
Chief Justice is a selected post.Members of Selection Committee for the High Court Judges and Chief Justice should come from Lok Pal , Working Gov't and Opposition.But Law should be on top for justice.
This is my small contribution to the anti-corruption movement.
O P KHANDURI Says:
# A3382LB June 7th, 2011 at 10:02 pm
Please download the attached file
Vaishali Singh Says:
# A3365LB June 7th, 2011 at 9:07 pm
in my view this lokpal should keep check on all three organs of government that are legislative , executive and judiciary.as well as media because sometime media person are also bribed to favor any individual , group or party because this is also kind of corruption .There should also be an check on them.
Chandra Prakash Says:
# A3362LB June 7th, 2011 at 9:03 pm
Functional of Lokpal: If there is evidence of corruption found against a Politician and from Minister till chaprasi in any Government of India offices and Government undertaking companies and Government enterprise and Government Board and its Affiliation and all Government departments, Lokpal or Lokayukta will have to file a case in appropriate trial court.During this time Lokpal and lokyukta will have powers to dismiss or suspend from there post(work) and should not allowed to work in any above said Government office, board, agencies until court verdict.
Ministers:Ministers should not be allowed to continue in their positions and should be removed from ministers
Citizen's Charter:Every department should have on spot complaint which should have ticket number and audit should be done every quarter for these ticket to closure and feedback should be taken from the complainer after resolving the issue.
Other: Have RAF kind of police force to protect Lokpal, Lokyukta, anti-corruption wing of CBI, CVC, vigilance departments, whistle blower protection,use these force during raid.
Public should be allowed to "Right to recall" President and Prime Minister and all types of Ministers, MLA, MLC in any Government of India and there performance should be published with full audit.
Page 10 of 47
« previous 1 2 ...7 8 9 1011 12 13 ...46 47 next »
© Copyright Lokpal Bill Consultation.
Web Development India